Apparently, I am not supposed to be happy. This is not necessarily news to me, but this
statement has been marinating in my mind for a month or so. Let me explain how this statement came to be
about and (if you haven’t already guessed) why it is ludicrous.
Awhile ago, I had the pleasure of reconnecting
with an old friend over dinner. We have
been friends for over twenty years, but had not sat down to talk for about
eight years or so. During this lapse of
time, both my friend and I experienced the “curveballs” that life can so
cruelly throw our way, and we spent some time catching each other up and
reflecting on our lives, the lessons we learned, etc. At one point during the evening, my friend looked at me and said “You sound really happy.” To which I replied, “You know, I really am.” And honestly, I am. If you look at my circumstances, or at the “curveballs” I’ve been given, you may think otherwise. In the eight year interim since my friend and I spoke I:
·
Due to the marriage I was in, I was also
swimming in debt that I am still crawling out of. Because of this…
·
I moved back home with my mother
However, during the same dinner with my dear friend, she shared another nugget of wisdom. After she caught me up on her life, she made the following statement (and I paraphrase here) – According to society, we should not be happy because we “failed” in succeeding at life.
Don’t be so quick to judge that statement. Many people I know – and unfortunately some people I go to church with – look at my current situation and sympathize with how bad I have it. And to many of those people, I have failed at life. I should be a happily married woman (whoops! Failed that one.) in my own home (strike two) with enough money to buy whatever my heart desires (and there is the death swing!). I have had some well meaning people come right out and tell me how bad my circumstances are. Really. In fact, when the issue of marrying again came up, an older woman chuckled at me and said “Well you waited too long to get married again.” Um, isn’t 39 the new 29?
No comments:
Post a Comment